The Nigerian Army has officially responded to allegations made by a dismissed ex-soldier, Lance Corporal Rotimi Olamilekan, popularly known as “Soja Boi,” following a viral interview that sparked widespread debate across social media and news platforms.
In a statement shared via its verified X (formerly Twitter) account, the Army described the claims as “sensationalised” and “misleading,” stressing the need to set the record straight to prevent public misinformation.
According to the Army, Olamilekan was not dismissed for “speaking the truth” or expressing political opinions, as suggested in the interview.
Instead, his discharge was the result of repeated acts of indiscipline, including violations of military regulations governing social media conduct.
The Army emphasized that its actions were in line with the provisions of the Armed Forces Act and internal codes of conduct that guide professional military operations.
Addressing concerns about soldiers’ welfare and remuneration, the Army maintained that it operates a structured and transparent salary system based on rank and years of service, as outlined in the Manual of Financial Administration for the Armed Forces of Nigeria (MAFA).
It added that personnel receive not only their basic salaries but also a range of allowances, including uniform allowances, ration cash support, and operational benefits for those deployed in active theatres.
The Army specifically referenced operations such as Operation HADIN KAI in the North East, noting that troops engaged in such missions are entitled to additional allowances and welfare packages designed to support their effectiveness and well-being.
Reacting to claims that soldiers are required to purchase their own uniforms and protective gear, the Army firmly dismissed the assertion as false.
It stated that the provision of uniforms, arms, ammunition, and protective equipment—including bulletproof vests and helmets—is a core institutional responsibility handled through established logistics and ordnance systems.
While acknowledging that some personnel may choose to supplement issued kits for personal comfort, the Army clarified that such actions are voluntary and do not reflect any systemic failure.
It further described allegations that soldiers are deployed without adequate protective gear as “reckless,” warning that such narratives could undermine troop morale and erode public confidence.
The Army reiterated that no personnel is deployed to operational theatres without the necessary equipment, dismissing suggestions that such gear is only issued during ceremonial visits as deliberate falsehoods.
Reaffirming its commitment to discipline, accountability, and troop welfare, the Nigerian Army concluded that all operational decisions, including postings and deployments, are guided strictly by strategic and operational considerations.
“I Filed a Petition Against Blessing CEO for Defrauding the Public” — VeryDarkMan
Sabinus Faces Divorce After Monthly Expenditures Exceeding £50,000 on Family Abroad
